Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Cute vs.Sexy vs. just plain wrong

Has anybody seen the new "novelty" baby stilettos being manufactured by some US company?

Seems now you can not only treat your baby like a doll, but you can also give them hooker shoes aswell. Some skank in Sydney is a re-seller for the shoes and says that "it's just a bit of fun. I'm sure all little girls want to look pretty." which while it may be true, is a justification for people to sexualise their children.

This woman was holding her high-heeled baby in the story I saw and let me tell you, there was nothing pretty about it. Here's a kid wearing a cute little dress with a cute little head band with a cute little bow on it. Then the hideous fire engine red baby stilettos. WRONG.

It's bad enough that you can't see a baby picture in a magazine or on the internet without knowing that some paedophile somewhere in the world has probably choked his chicken over that or similar images. Far worse is the sexualisation of babies by use of adult attire. If an innocent picture of a baby can get a pervert going, what the fuck do you think a picture of a baby in heels is going to do? This shit sends a statement to those deviants that there is some level of acceptibility to sexualising children which in their twisted minds could potentially justify the abuses they may commit against children or the stimluation they get from seeing these images.

For those who choose to put such trash accessories on their kids, you are exposing your child to dangers that no child should volunteered for by parents who think it's "cute". What you call cute, paedophiles call "sexy".

Do you want a child that your family and friends know is CUTE, or do you want a child who is also considered SEXY?

For a look at what some morons are putting their kids in, check this out http://www.heelarious.com/index.php I don't think it's HEELARIOUS at all. I think it's a blight on any person who should know it's their job to protect the vulnerable, not sexualise them.

No comments: